pageside
Zur Institute, INNOVATIVE RESOURCES and ONLINE CONTINUING EDUCATION
Sign In
.
pageside
HR
Pageside

CSS Submit Button Rollover Css3Menu.com

Pageside
Pageside

 

Telehealth and E-Therapy Updates
Updated 2011

By Ofer Zur, Ph.D.
 

This article is part of an online course on for CE credits, Telehealth: The New Standard.

 

Table Of Contents        2007 ~ 2008 ~ 2011
 

 
2007

Practicing Across State Lines
Hageseth vs. Superior Court, May/07:

Practicing across state lines is probably the hottest issue in telehealth and in medicine in general. The issue is whether psychotherapists or medical doctors can treat clients in other states via the phone, email, or Internet. One of the first cases to reach the courts took place in May/07 in CA.

Following is a case synopsis.

The case, Hageseth v. Superior Court, involved a Colorado doctor who participated in an online pharmacy. The doctor, Hageseth, issued an online prescription to a patient in California and was then charged criminally with practicing medicine without a license in California. (What partly fueled this case, but not directly relevant to the telehealth issue, are the facts that the patient committed suicide a few days after he fulfilled the prescription, and Dr. Hageseth was not allowed to prescribe at the time he wrote the prescription.) Hageseth claimed that he couldn't be charged with a California crime because he was beyond California's jurisdiction. The defense asserted that prosecuting Dr. Hageseth would create all sorts of trouble for California (or other states, which may follow suit) to try to regulate such conduct beyond its borders. The appeals court disagreed, finding that under traditional principles of "extraterritorial application of criminal law" the state of California could reach the doctor's conduct. The fact that the doctor's conduct took place "in cyberspace" -- that is, using email and Websites -- was irrelevant.

In Summary: This case is extremely important for the future of telehealth (e-therapy) across state lines and for the huge online prescription industry. This case has no bearing on practicing telehealth within one state when both clinician and patient reside in the state where the clinician is licensed.

More information about the case:

For video describing the case: click here

 
Different View On Across State Lines:

 
2008 Guidelines

 
2011

Medicare Relaxes Restrictions For Telehealth Credentialing

Starting July 5, 2011, Medicare will change its credentialing and privileging process for health care professionals providing services through telehealth systems. Hospitals will need to be credentialed and not each and every practitioner wanting to deliver telehealth. This represents a substantial relaxation of rules, and bodes well for reimbursement in the U.S. See full report: Medicare Relaxes Restrictions for Telehealth Credentialing

More info: http://searchhealthit.techtarget.com/healthitexchange/healthitpulse/telemedicine-at-crossroads-as-cms-mulls-final-rule/


7% Of Physicians Use Online Video Chat With Patients

For more info: http://manhattanresearch.com/News-and-Events/Press-Releases/ physician-patient-online-video-conferencing


Is Skype A Secure Site For Therapy Via Teleconferencing

There seem to be some disagreements in regard to the issue of confidentiality and the use of Skype in psychotherapy and counseling.


Australian Government Offers $6000 To GPs For Telehealth Practice Set-up

The Aussies are ahead of the curve when it comes to telehealth. For info, click here.


Guidelines


CMS Eases Requirements for E-Prescribing


California Lifts Restrictions On Tele Mental Health Reimbursement

  • www.leginfo.ca.gov/pub/11-12/bill/asm/ab_0401-0450/ab_415_bill_20111007_chaptered.pdf
  • On October 7, 2011 California enacted a comprehensive law to advance telehealth. 
  • The new law:
    • Replaces legal terminology of "telemedicine" with "telehealth".
    • Updates the definition of telehealth to allow a broader range of services.
    • Applies the definition to all licensed health professionals.
    • Replaces the need for an additional written patient consent specifically for telehealth services to a verbal consent.
    • Removes the Medi-Cal rule requiring documentation of a barrier to an in-person visit before a beneficiary can receive telehealth services.
    • Eliminates restrictions on reimbursement of services provided via email or telephone.
    • Eliminates restrictions on the physical location where telehealth services may be provided. It no longer it needs to be in doctors' offices or hospitals.


Recommendations To The Center For Medicare & Medicaid Innovation Telemental Health Counseling (By ATA)

www.americantelemed.org/files/public/policy/CMMIProposition6.pdf


Cleveland Clinic Uses iPads To Ease Children's Fears

www.wkyc.com/news/health/article/221951/7/Cleveland-Clinic-uses-iPads-to-ease-childrens-fears

 
Top of Page

Pageside
Pageside

 


Share This:

Follow Us On:     TwitterFacebookLinkedInGoogle Plus

Click here to receive clinical updates by e-mail.

Online Courses  -  Zur Institute on YouTubeYouTube
Live Workshops  -  Forensic & Expert Witness Services -  Consultations for Therapists
Private Practice Handbook  -  HIPAA Compliance Kit  -  Clinical Forms  -  CE Info  -  Discussions
Online Catalog -  Free Articles  -  Boundaries & Dual Relationships  -  General Public Resources  -  Seminars For General Public
Organizational Discounts  -  About Us  -  FAQ  -  Privacy, Disclaimer, Terms of Use, DMCA  -  ADA Policy & Grievance -  CV
Home -  Contact Us  -  Site Map


ZUR INSTITUTE, LLC
Ofer Zur, Ph.D., Director

Sonoma Medical Plaza, 181 Andrieux St. Suite 212, Sonoma, CA 95476
Phone: 707-935-0655, Fax: 707-736-7045, Email: info@zurinstitute.com

© 1997-2014 Ofer Zur, Ph.D., LLC. All rights reserved. Privacy Statement, Disclaimer & Terms of Use.
Site design/maintenance by R&D Web

Pageside