Myths and Faulty Beliefs Regarding Ethics and the Standard of Care in Psychotherapy & Counseling
Many decisions regarding clinical work are derived from an understanding of standards of care that may be based on beliefs that are not fully developed or based on unvalidated assumptions. While a crucial consideration, too often risk management concerns override other, equally, if not more important, aspects of clinical care.
This intermediate level course is comprised of 2 videos with audio and text versions of Dr. Ofer Zur discussing how certain clinical myths and beliefs creep into decision making, at times at the expense of what might be best for the client. Dr. Zur begins with an overview of one of the foundations of therapist/evaluator interactions, the standard of care, and by reviewing certain misconceptions he provides insights into how clinicians can provide ethically grounded, compassionate care that best serves their clients.
In addition to Dr. Zur’s discussion of ethical considerations, he presents on topics of clinical concerns such as assumptions regarding infidelity, telemental health, and other contemporary topics.
Educational Objectives
- Identify how to utilize the standard of care in clinical work
- Evaluate whether one’s beliefs regarding risk management are consistent with the standard of care
- Compare therapists’ standard beliefs regarding victimhood to Dr. Zur’s proposed 5 levels of victimhood
- Evaluate different types of power that exist in clinical relationships
Syllabus
- Introduction
- Power Differentials
- Nine types of power
- Non-sexual touch
- Cultural norms
- DSM misconceptions
- Risk Management and the standard of care
- Attitudes about victimhood
- 5 levels of victimhood
- Telemental health is not new
- Dual relationships and ethics
- The Slippery slope fallacy
- Boundary crossings
- Malpractice lawsuits
- Marital affairs
- 11 types of affairs
- Telemental health and risks of boundary violations
- Is it ever ethical for a therapist to be naked with a client?
